Investor Alert > Oppenheimer Broker Steven Baaden Subject to Customer Dispute Disclosures
Posted May 26, 2021
by Alan Rosca

Oppenheimer Broker Steven Baaden Subject to Customer Dispute Disclosures

Oppenheimer Broker Steven Baaden Subject to Customer DisputesThe Rosca Scarlato LLC law firm attorneys are investigating circumstances related to various customer disputes filed with FINRA involving broker Steven Baaden (also known as Steve Richard Baaden and Steven Richard Baaden), according to Baaden’s FINRA Brokercheck page.

Investor rights attorney Alan Rosca and his colleagues are investigating circumstances surrounding the various allegations reportedly invoked by Mr. Baaden’s customers.

Investors who are concerned about their investments with broker Steven Baaden may contact attorney Alan Rosca or his colleagues for a free consultation and discussion of potential options, or to provide any useful information. Interested investors may call 888-998-0530, send an email to arosca@rscounsel.law, or complete the contact form on this webpage.

Concerned about investments with 

Broker

Steve Baaden Facing Allegations of Unsuitability and Fraud, Among Others

As reported on Baaden’s Brokercheck page, a recent customer dispute filed in February 2021 alleges unsuitability, fraud, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with investments. The customer alleged that Baaden was registered with Oppenheimer & Co when the allegations occurred and that the allegations involved common & preferred stocks.

Between 1988 and 2013, customers of Steven Richard Baaden were reportedly paid over $250,000 in combined settlements, according to his Brokercheck page.

In May 2013, a customer received a settlement to the tune of $11,337.21 on allegations of unauthorized transactions made to generate additional fees and commissions. The customer alleged that Baaden was registered with Merrill Lynch, Pierce & Smith when the allegations occurred and that the dispute involved common and preferred stock investment products.

Another customer received a settlement in March 2013 to the tune of $25,494.18 on allegations of unauthorized trading and conduct resulting in overcharging the customer’s account. This customer also alleged that Steven Baaden was registered with Merrill Lynch when he engaged in the aforementioned allegations, while the product type involved was reportedly “Equity-OTC”.

In December 1994 a customer received a settlement of $112,000 on allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, account-related negligence, and misrepresentation while Baaden was registered with Painewebber.

Similarly, another customer received a settlement of $30,000 in January 1994 on allegations of breach of fiduciary duty and improper management of their investment accounts involving limited partnerships. The customer initially sought to recover $100,00.

Additionally in 1993 and 1989, two customers won arbitration cases filed for allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, churning, misrepresentation, and unauthorized trading, among others. One customer was awarded $102,363.61 in April 1993 and a second customer was awarded $5,465 in June 1989.

Investors who are concerned about their investment with Steve R Baaden may contact attorney Alan Rosca or his colleagues for a free case evaluation and discussion of potential options toll free at 888-998-0530, via email at arosca@rscounsel.law, or through the contact form on this webpage.

Broker Steven Baaden Has Been Registered with FINRA for 36 Years

Baaden has been registered with FINRA since 1984 and switched employers six times according to his Brokercheck page. Baaden is currently a registered broker and investment adviser with Oppenheimer & Co located in Los Angeles, California. He has been registered with the firm since February 2013.

He was previously employed with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith located in El Segundo, California from September 2008 until February 2013. Broker Steve Baaden was reportedly discharged from the firm in 2013 on allegations of overcharging certain clients according to his Brokercheck page.

He was also employed with Citigroup Global Markets, UBS Financial Services, Bateman Eichler Hill Richards, and Coastal Securities.

Finally, it is important to note that, as of the date of this article, there has not been a finding of liability as to the complaints or allegations mentioned in this article, unless otherwise indicated. Any reader should also read the original sources hyperlinked in this blog for accuracy, including any BrokerCheck report and/or record of any disciplinary or regulatory action. Those sources are incorporated by reference into the text of this blog, and are the governing materials in case of any inconsistencies or typos in this blog.

Concerned about investments with 

Broker

Investor Rights Attorneys Are Investigating

The Rosca Scarlato LLC law firm represents investors who lose money as a result of investment-related fraud or broker misconduct and is currently investigating conduct related to broker Steve Baaden’s and the customer dispute disclosures alleging unsuitability, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, churning, misrepresentation, unauthorized trading, among others.

The firm takes most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advances the case costs, and only gets paid for their fees and costs out of money recovered for clients. Attorney Alan Rosca, a securities lawyer and adjunct professor of securities regulation, has represented thousands of victimized investors across the country and around the world in cases ranging from arbitrations to class actions.

Baaden investors who are concerned about their investments with the Oppenheimer broker may contact attorney Alan Rosca for a free case evaluation and discussion of potential options, or to provide any useful information, by calling 888-998-0530, via email at arosca@rscounsel.law, or through the contact form on this webpage.

Contact us. All evaluations are free

DISCLAIMER

In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow matters about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent updates regarding various developments that may occur in such matters. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such matters and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such matters. Also, the Brokercheck report linked to some of our blogs is the up-to-date version as of the date of accessing by the reader. The information in our blogs is current as of the date of the drafting of the blog, and given that sometimes certain past complaints may no longer be listed in newer Brokercheck reports, some of the events referenced in some of our blogs may later on be removed from newer Brokercheck reports. Visitors may check the most recent version of each brokercheck report at www.finra.org, and may contact FINRA for the earlier version of the Brokercheck report upon which various blogs may be based.

If you believe you lost money as a result of investment-related fraud or misconduct, please contact our law firm for a free, no-obligation evaluation of your recovery options.

Contact us at 888‑998‑0530 or through the contact form on this page.
No recovery, no fees.*

How to contact us?

We can also do a Zoom call to discuss your matter.